Yovan Gabric: property-first marketing strategy
Prepared 10 October 2026 · Live-site research · 90-day execution plan
Business priority: seller listings first; pre-construction and resale buyer clients alongside. Monthly media budget: up to CAD $1,000, excluding production and software, revised to the user's latest limit. This is a ceiling, not a spending target. All budgets below are proposed spending allocations, not forecasts or authorization to spend.
The recommendation is to market the decision before the transaction: before you spend preparing a home, choose a floor plan, or make an offer, understand the property. Your construction experience becomes valuable when the prospect receives a specific recommendation. The primary product is a written seller preparation plan; the secondary product is a small, reasoned comparison of buying options.
What to do next
The next job is to prepare one seller campaign for launch. Keep the monthly advertising ceiling at CAD $1,000. Start with the Prepare-to-Sell Review; use organic content to support pre-construction and resale buyers while the seller campaign is being tested.
| Order | Work to complete | Finished when | Responsibility |
| 1 | Finalize the seller offer | The free review's service area, scope, written deliverable and available appointment capacity are clear | Yovan |
| 2 | Prepare a sample seller plan | A clearly labelled example shows repair, improve, investigate and leave-alone recommendations without invented client results | Draft for Yovan's review |
| 3 | Prepare the landing page | /reno-estimate matches the offer; placeholders and overclaims are removed; privacy and optional marketing consent are clear | Website preparation, then review before publishing |
| 4 | Test the lead journey | A mobile test reaches the correct inbox/CRM, records consent, shows success/error states and allows the next appointment step | Website and CRM verification |
| 5 | Produce two seller ads | One kitchen-decision ad and one sell-as-is-versus-prepare ad, using Yovan's footage or permissioned photography and proper brokerage identification | Yovan records; creative prepared for review |
| 6 | Prepare the campaign | One seller campaign, one service-area ad set, two creatives and a total spending limit within CAD $1,000/month | Ads Manager setup; current settings checked |
| 7 | Review and launch | Yovan approves the finished ads, destination, lead handling and exact spending limit | Yovan's approval before paid launch |
| 8 | Review results weekly | Every inquiry has an owner and next action; spending, conversations and attended seller reviews are recorded | Yovan / designated lead owner |
First working session: settle the offer and create the sample written preparation plan. Then use that plan to shape the landing page and the two ads. This is the concrete starting point; another round of strategy documents is not needed.
What Yovan needs to provide: a realistic number of walkthrough appointments per week, preferred response hours, confirmation of the lead inbox/CRM, and a short on-camera recording or suitable photographs with usage permission. Existing approved brand assets can be reused.
Launch gate: reviewing this document does not launch advertising or authorize a public-site change. Prepare everything for review first, then approve the actual campaign and destination. No ad spend is incurred by opening this HTML file.
1. What was researched—and what was not
I fetched the live homepage, robots file, XML sitemap, both HTML page directories, and followed internal HTML links until discovery was exhausted. The crawl retrieved metadata and visible text across 233 successful HTML URLs. It also found two malformed email-template destinations returning HTTP 400.
| Coverage | Observed result |
| Successful HTML URLs | 233 |
| URLs present in the XML sitemap | 182 |
Successful URLs carrying a robots noindex directive | 44 |
| Successful URLs outside the XML sitemap | 51 |
Outside the sitemap without an observed noindex directive | 7 |
| Malformed placeholder destinations | 2 |
These are URL counts, not counts of unique services or Google-indexed pages. /precon-hub, for example, shares the canonical of /pre-construction. Google indexing cannot be established from a robots tag or sitemap; Search Console access would be required. Completely unlinked routes, authenticated pages and individual client reports/CMAs are outside this discovery method. This is a complete crawl of the discovered HTML link graph, with deeper editorial review of the hubs, conversion pages and campaign playbooks—not a legal, financial or line-by-line technical validation of every article.
The accompanying page review assigns every successfully fetched URL a marketing role and next action. Raw inventory records status, metadata, canonical and sitemap membership. The local checkout is materially smaller than the live site, so this strategy uses the live site as its evidence base and does not assume local source matches production.
No advertisements, emails, form submissions, site changes or public-access changes were made. Form delivery, CRM integrations, analytics, audience sizes and advertising performance remain unverified.
2. The opportunity your website already supports
The site has enough content to begin testing acquisition once its conversion paths are ready. More articles are not the immediate priority.
| Existing asset | Role in the business | Recommended conversion |
| Seller service, reno estimate, home prep, home value | Primary listing acquisition | Request a Prepare-to-Sell Review |
| Home Value Concierge, Renovation Hub | Reach owners before they decide to sell | Identify selling, staying or buying-with-work; route accordingly |
| Contractor introduction and 35 renovation-section URLs | Practical service, repeat contact and future seller relationships | Scope discussion, then a private introduction if appropriate |
| Pre-construction hub and 56 project-detail routes | Project discovery and buyer qualification | Request up to three suitable options with plan notes |
| Resale alternative, deals hub and 20 segment pages | Convert interest in new homes into whichever purchase fits | Compare pre-construction with a screened resale shortlist |
| Power of sale and opportunity alerts | Specialist buyer acquisition and opted-in retention | Choose areas and opportunity types; then review a property |
| Calculators, checklist, blog | Demonstrate useful judgment before asking for contact details | Apply the tool or checklist to the visitor's own situation |
| Communities, market report, news | Local relevance and a reason to return | A relevant seller review or buyer comparison |
| Start here | Route referrals and general visitors | Let the visitor choose a situation |
Use /start for a profile bio, referral introduction or general QR code. Send paid ads to the page matching that specific promise. A person responding to a kitchen-preparation ad should immediately see the seller review, not a menu of 56 projects.
3. Fix these before buying traffic
These are observed issues and conversion recommendations, not completed fixes.
| Priority | Live evidence | Action |
| Before launch | Homepage has six review placeholders; /results contains unfinished client-story slots and editing instructions | Remove incomplete proof from public conversion journeys or replace it with verified, consented material. Use a clearly labelled sample preparation plan while real proof is being collected. |
| Before launch | /reno-estimate promises no follow-up campaign and request-only data use; /precon-discovery promises no automated sequence | Honour those promises. Separate requested-service communication from optional ongoing marketing. Do not enroll existing request-only leads into a drip. |
| Before launch | No privacy-policy link was discovered in the crawled HTML link graph | Establish and visibly link a policy covering forms, service providers, retention, tracking and contact rights. A policy may exist elsewhere; its existence and accessibility were not verified. |
| Before launch | No lead-delivery or analytics test was performed | Test each campaign destination from phone submission through notification, CRM record, consent record, booking, success/error state and duplicate handling. Test instant-form delivery separately. |
| Before relevant campaign | Power-of-sale listings hub explicitly warns that display permission needs confirmation | Use the public explainer and opt-in alert page. Keep the listing hub out of campaign distribution until the brokerage confirms the permitted display and sharing arrangements. |
| Before relevant campaign | South Banks launch/deck pages still contain September 22–26 launch or worksheet messaging | Retire dated urgency from active journeys and refresh facts from current authorized material. Keep archive pages clearly labelled as historical. |
| Before relevant campaign | Five Oaks invitation is dated 10 October; the project page says 24 October; its older internal campaign plan anticipates November pricing | Treat the old campaign calendar as obsolete. Reconfirm builder facts, reconcile all copies, and expire the invitation after the actual event. No project dates or prices were independently confirmed with the builder in this audit. |
| Before relevant campaign | Five Oaks detail text describes prices as net of a rebate, while its question table still says rebate treatment needs confirmation | Resolve the contradiction before any price-led creative. Avoid blanket tax-savings or rental-income claims. |
| Before reuse | /projects/mattamy-milton/report is explicitly a sample with data placeholders | Exclude it from client and advertising sequences until completed. |
| Soon | Publicly reachable noindex reference pages include material labelled private, including an operating document naming contractors | noindex is not access control. Move confidential operations behind proper access protection. Do not use internal reference documents as public lead magnets without a separate client-safe edition. |
| Soon | /news/brief/2026-10-15 returned 200 on 10 October while /pages describes it as not live | Reconcile scheduling and archive labels; prevent future-dated material from appearing to be a completed report. |
| Soon | %%unsubscribe%% and %%profile_url%% links remain in web versions of email material | Give web versions functional destinations rather than unexpanded mailing-system placeholders. |
Also tighten claims. The preparation offer sometimes implies certainty about structural issues, legality or financial returns; the primary service should be preliminary observations, priorities and questions for specialists. Preserve the 25+ years of experience provided in your brief. Verify any specific licence claim before repeating it in ads. Keep brokerage/network achievements clearly attributed and documented; do not imply they are personal transaction results.
Your existing internal advertising plans contain useful ideas, but also numerical return examples, fixed targeting-radius assumptions and performance assertions that should not be copied without verification. Replace “a $500 fix adds $5,000” with an actual documented case or a non-numerical decision example. Server-side tracking can improve measurement, but it is not a universal prerequisite for using native lead forms.
4. One brand promise, three offers
Suggested master line:
Understand the property before you make your next move.
Supporting copy:
“I bring more than 25 years of construction, renovation and project-management experience to buying and selling real estate. We look at condition, preparation, layout and costs alongside the market, so you can decide what deserves action—and what does not.”
Offer A: Prepare-to-Sell Review — the flagship
Consumer headline: Before you renovate to sell, find out what is worth doing.
Promise: a practical written plan for a homeowner considering a sale, including what to address, investigate, improve or leave alone. It is free and carries no obligation to list, consistent with the existing offer.
Deliverable, normally one or two pages:
- Property and intended selling timeframe.
- Investigate first: observations requiring an inspector, engineer or qualified trade.
- Repair: issues to address before preparation continues.
- Improve: presentation changes worth considering in this property's context.
- Leave alone: work not justified by the likely timing, scope or available evidence.
- Preliminary budget allowances and dependencies, clearly distinguished from quotations.
- A reasoned as-is versus prepared pricing discussion using current relevant comparables; no guaranteed uplift.
- The next decision: prepare and list, price for present condition, or postpone the sale.
Start with a brief fit call and offer a walkthrough where appropriate. Do not promise an unlimited free inspection or a full estimating service. Set capacity before spending: if only four new walkthroughs per week can be served well, manage availability against that actual limit. Do not advertise invented scarcity.
Conversion ladder: useful ad → short review request → fit call → walkthrough → written plan → listing strategy meeting → signed client. The meeting invitation follows the homeowner's interest: “Would it help to compare selling as-is with preparing these specific items?”
Primary destination: refine /reno-estimate around this promise. Keep /homeprep as a locally tailored print/QR variation after its data and display permissions are checked. Avoid sending broad GTA traffic to its street-specific examples. Keep /home-value as a secondary angle: value plus preparation decisions, not another automated valuation pitch.
Offer B: Pre-Con or Resale Decision Review
Consumer headline: Before you choose a new-build project, compare it with what you can buy today.
Deliverable: up to three relevant options, including a resale alternative where suitable, with a concise comparison of usable layout, verified price basis, deposit timing, possession assumptions, ongoing costs, remaining questions and the documents to obtain. Include the possibility that none is suitable. Lawyer and mortgage professional review remain separate.
Conversion ladder: project/decision ad → short request → needs conversation → current options sheet → 20-minute comparison appointment → showing or builder visit → representation and transaction steps as appropriate.
Use /resale-alternative after removing broad assumptions that pre-con always means a long wait or that resale cannot have closing complications. Match product types: a freehold town should be compared with an appropriate freehold alternative, not automatically a two-bedroom condo. Use a freshly verified project landing page for people asking about that named project. Move the 14-question /precon-discovery questionnaire after initial engagement.
When a project is unsuitable, retain the relationship: ask permission to compare another project or resale. A project rejection should not automatically become a lost lead.
Offer C: Property Opportunity Review
Consumer headline: A lower asking price is only the start of the analysis.
For resale, renovation candidates and power of sale: review relevant comparables, visible condition questions, investigation needs, preliminary renovation scope, financing/closing dependencies and current documents. Never equate power of sale with a guaranteed bargain or promise a discount.
Route through /deals, a relevant city/segment page, or /power-of-sale. Ask for an address only through an appropriate private channel. Use authorized listing links; do not republish restricted property data. This is initially an organic and nurture offer, not a separate cold-paid campaign.
5. How the contractor hub produces real-estate clients
Keep the current private-introduction model. Your pages explicitly promise no public contractor directory, lead fees or reciprocal referral arrangement. Do not replace it with paid placements or referral obligations.
The useful sequence is: homeowner question → scope discussion → appropriate introduction → follow-through on the request → optional future real-estate relationship.
At intake, use the existing situation choices: preparing to sell; may sell later; staying; buying with work; investment. Then:
- Preparing to sell: offer the preparation review before an expensive scope is commissioned.
- Staying: deliver the introduction they asked for. Offer optional seasonal planning updates separately; do not turn the introduction into a listing pitch.
- Buying with work: connect scope and sequencing to their property comparison before they commit.
- Investor: discuss scope and assumptions as part of property analysis, without promising rent, suite legality or returns.
Ask permission before sharing a homeowner's details with a contractor. Record introduction date, requested work, paperwork status, whether contact occurred and the next service action. Check after roughly one week that the introduction was useful; this must remain within the service requested. Longer-term marketing needs its own permission.
Content opportunities: “Three things to settle before asking for quotes,” “Refresh or replace this kitchen?”, “Why fixing the source of a stain comes before repainting,” and “Which preparation jobs depend on other trades?” Film your reasoning; obtain property and participant permissions. Do not publish contractor names or co-branded endorsements without a specific agreement.
Track contractor-introduction requests separately from real-estate leads. A homeowner finding a painter is not yet a qualified listing prospect.
6. Facebook and Instagram campaign structure
Use Meta Ads Manager with a Leads objective, appropriate Housing special-ad-category treatment and compliant location settings. Your creative should identify the situation and service area. Do not build the plan around age, gender, income, postal-code targeting or standard lookalikes. Meta's official material documents housing-ad restrictions and discontinuation of Special Ad Audiences, including expansion to Canada. Current account controls must be checked at setup; some current Help Centre pages were login-blocked during research. Meta source
Start with one paid seller campaign and one service-area prospecting ad set. Let placements cover Facebook and Instagram rather than dividing this budget into platform, age or city fragments. Use permitted geography covering where you can realistically provide service. Feature Oakville, Burlington and Milton in seller creative. Pre-construction, resale and contractor content initially attract leads through organic posts, referrals and appropriately consented follow-up. Do not launch a second paid campaign automatically.
| Stage | Seller prospecting | Buyer comparison / selected pre-con | Retargeting | Monthly maximum |
| First month: recommended | Up to $1,000 | $0 paid; organic support | $0 | $1,000 |
| Later month: optional buyer test | Up to $800 | Up to $200 for one bounded test | $0 | $1,000 |
| If spending below the ceiling | Chosen available budget | $0 paid initially | $0 | Your chosen amount, no more than $1,000 |
A full-month starting pace of approximately $30/day leaves room below the $1,000 ceiling, but daily pacing is not a hard monthly cap. Configure appropriate fixed-period budget/spend controls and monitor actual spend so all campaigns together remain within the limit. Start only after the conversion path passes its checks; do not rush to spend unused budget. The optional $200 buyer test is a small exploratory test, not enough to promise a reliable acquisition benchmark. Run it in a defined window after the seller baseline is established, reducing seller spend accordingly. If seller results remain uncertain, keep improving that campaign instead of splitting funds.
There is no separate retargeting allocation at launch. Any later retargeting experiment must replace part of the existing budget, not add to it, and needs an eligible audience large enough to support delivery. Avoid using confidential client pages, sensitive answers or contractor application data to build audiences. Do not assume a customer list is eligible simply because you possess it.
Do not add separate contractor, power-of-sale, newsletter, six-city and individual-project campaigns at this budget. A single fresh project can temporarily replace a buyer-comparison creative when it has verified information, capacity and a suitable audience; it should not displace the core seller allocation automatically.
Conversion path and testing
Start with the website review form if delivery and mobile usability pass. If website tracking or conversion volume is inadequate, test an available higher-intent native form. Keep the offer identical so the comparison is meaningful. At the low budget, test paths sequentially rather than opening many simultaneous cells.
Start with two seller creatives: the kitchen decision and sell-as-is versus prepare. Keep the third seller concept and two buyer concepts as future tests or organic posts. Change one major variable at a time: hook first, then destination, then form friction. Compare cost per attended qualified appointment, with lead response time and disqualification reasons alongside it. Cheap form fills alone are not the goal. Expect limited samples at this budget; do not declare a winner from one appointment.
Begin with basic contact details, chosen service/city and intended timing. On Meta native forms use the supported contact fields and check current question restrictions; keep detailed financial qualification for a private follow-up. Offer a preferred contact channel. Website forms can progressively collect property context after the first request. Avoid requiring a street address merely to read a checklist.
Measurement
Keep first-source and latest-source fields, campaign/ad identifiers, landing page, submission timestamp, requested service, owner, response time, next action and consent evidence. For website traffic use, for example:
utm_source=meta&utm_medium=paid_social&utm_campaign=yg_seller_prep_2026q4&utm_content=kitchen_video_a
Native forms should preserve Meta campaign, ad, form and lead IDs through the connector. Events should distinguish accepted form submissions from mere button clicks. Track booked and attended appointments in the CRM; return eligible outcome events to Meta only after the data flow and privacy requirements are verified. If browser and server events are both used, test deduplication. Do not transmit addresses, free-text property concerns or sensitive financial answers as analytics parameters.
7. Draft advertisements and video scripts
These are new copy proposals. Final creative needs the correct registered name, permitted professional descriptor and clear brokerage identification. Verify those before release. RECO's online guidance applies to social posts as well as websites. RECO online advertising · Permitted terms
Seller A — kitchen decision
Headline: Before you replace the kitchen, make a plan.
“Getting an Oakville, Burlington or Milton home ready to sell? A full renovation may not be the right first step. I bring 25+ years of construction and renovation experience to a practical review of what to repair, improve, investigate or leave alone. Request a free Prepare-to-Sell Review and get a written plan for your home. No obligation to list.”
CTA: Request My Prep Plan. Visual: Yovan in a real, permissioned kitchen, pointing out a decision rather than presenting a fabricated before/after result.
Seller B — as-is versus prepare
Headline: Sell as-is—or prepare first?
“Before spending on a home you plan to sell, compare the options. We will look at the property's condition, likely preparation work, timing and relevant market evidence. You receive a clear priority plan and the questions worth resolving before listing.”
CTA: Compare My Options. Visual: a simple sample plan with three columns—repair, improve, leave alone—labelled illustrative.
Seller C — planning ahead
Headline: Thinking about selling next year? Start with the house.
“A useful first step is knowing what the property needs before the rush to list. I help homeowners set priorities, identify work that needs specialist advice and avoid taking on renovations without a clear reason. Request your free preparation review.”
CTA: Plan Before I List. Visual: Yovan walking through a permissioned property with a short checklist.
Buyer A — compare both paths
Headline: New construction or resale? Compare both.
“The same purchase budget can lead to very different decisions. I compare suitable pre-construction and resale options through layout, deposit timing, ownership costs, possession and property questions. Tell me what you need, and we will narrow the options before you commit.”
CTA: Request My Comparison. Visual: permitted floor-plan material beside a neutral comparison sheet, without fabricated savings.
Buyer B — layout review
Headline: Look beyond the square footage.
“Stairs, storage and usable room dimensions can change how a home works day to day. My construction background helps turn the floor plan into practical questions. Request a review of the layouts and alternatives that fit your plans.”
CTA: Review My Options. Named-project variant: “Considering Five Oaks in Oakville? Let's compare the layouts and questions that matter to your purchase.” Use only after current page facts and image rights are checked; no unverified price, event or access claim is needed.
Power-of-sale organic / later warm creative
Headline: Power of sale? Look at more than the price.
“Condition, required work and the seller's terms can change the decision. Read my screening approach, then choose whether you want relevant opportunity alerts.”
CTA: See What to Check → public /power-of-sale, not the review-only listing hub.
Two 30-second filming outlines
Seller: 0–4 seconds: “Before you replace this kitchen to sell the house, I would ask three questions.” 4–18: “Is it functioning properly? What would buyers need investigated? And does a full replacement make sense for this home's timing and market?” 18–25: “After 25 years in construction and renovation, my first job is helping you choose the work.” 25–30: “Request a free Prepare-to-Sell Review. You get a written plan, with no obligation to list.”
Buyer: 0–4 seconds: “Two floor plans can have similar square footage and live very differently.” 4–18: show stairs, circulation and usable room dimensions on a permissioned plan; make observations without certifying structural feasibility. 18–25: “Then we compare the price basis, deposits, timing and resale alternatives.” 25–30: “Request your property comparison before choosing the project.”
Produce a vertical video and a feed-friendly crop, with readable captions and brokerage identification. Use real demonstrations, permissioned photos and properly labelled builder renderings. Avoid invented testimonials, AI images presented as actual projects or unsupported superiority claims about other agents.
8. Landing-page and lead-handling specification
The paid landing page needs one primary task, with these elements in order:
- The same promise as the ad and the actual service area.
- A short personal video explaining what the visitor receives.
- A sample deliverable, visibly labelled as a sample.
- Three or four concrete benefits and appropriate limits.
- A short request form, privacy link and clear contact expectations.
- Optional, separate, unticked permission for ongoing topic-specific updates.
- Success state with an optional booking choice and direct contact information.
Deliver what the ad promised without making an unannounced phone call or marketing subscription a condition of receiving it. If a personalized plan requires a walkthrough, explain that before submission.
Use your existing CRM if suitable. The internal August plan names BoldTrail, but current configuration and integrations were not verified. First establish one dependable system of record; do not buy another platform simply to duplicate it.
Response and nurture
Set an internal response target of about 15 minutes during staffed advertising hours, and an honest after-hours expectation. This is an operational target, not a claimed conversion multiplier. If that is not feasible, advertise the response window you can actually maintain.
| Moment | Seller request | Buyer comparison request |
| Immediately | Acknowledge the request, explain the plan and next step | Acknowledge the requested project or comparison |
| First human response | “What are you most unsure about preparing before a sale?” | “Is your priority a home to live in, an investment, or comparing possibilities?” |
| Fit conversation | City, timing, scope of question, access and existing representation | Preferred area/type, timing, requirements and representation; discuss finances privately as needed |
| Next appointment | Walkthrough, then written priorities | Review up to three relevant choices |
| After delivery | “Would you like to compare an as-is listing with these preparation options?” | “Which option deserves a showing or a builder conversation?” |
For optional ongoing marketing subscribers only: day 2 send one relevant guide; day 5 show a labelled example of the review process; day 10 offer the next small step; day 14 ask whether they prefer an appointment, occasional updates or to stop. Adjust for their replies; do not run this sequence against people promised request-only contact. For a delivered request with no ongoing permission, make only appropriate request-related contact and close the task when complete.
A weekly update suits someone actively comparing available homes only if that is what they requested. A monthly preparation note may suit an owner planning next year. Never silently switch one subscriber between these lists. Separate daily MLS matches from Yovan's occasional analysis so the frequency is clear.
CASL guidance requires an appropriate consent basis, identification/contact information and a working unsubscribe mechanism for commercial electronic messages. Record purpose, wording/version, time and withdrawal status. An old lead list or a public email address is not blanket permission. Do not switch to cold calls merely to avoid email requirements. CRTC guidance
9. Organic, referral and local distribution
Use paid ads to test offers; use organic content to prove how you think. A manageable starting rhythm is two short videos and one practical carousel/post per week, adapted for Facebook and Instagram. Add one local market or project update only when there is verified useful information. Do not promise daily production if it will displace client follow-through.
| Week | Seller video | Buyer video | Practical post | Main CTA |
| 1 | Before replacing a kitchen | New build versus resale: compare the same needs | The four parts of a prep plan | Seller review |
| 2 | What to settle before collecting quotes | What usable floor area means | Repair / improve / leave alone sample | Seller review |
| 3 | Preparing now for a later sale | A floor-plan walkthrough | What a contractor introduction includes | Seller review / appropriate introduction |
| 4 | Sell as-is: questions before deciding | Power-of-sale screening questions | A real, approved case or labelled process example | Review or alerts |
Repeat the structure with new actual questions rather than creating unrelated topics. Group posts should follow the group's rules and contribute an answer. If using “comment PLAN” or “comment COMPARE,” deliver the requested response manually until supported automation is tested. A comment is not permission for an indefinite marketing sequence.
For Google Business Profile, keep services, contact details and relevant site links accurate; post useful local advice and ask real clients for honest reviews without inventing or rewarding outcomes. Use permissioned past-client introductions and a narrowly defined neighbourhood print test with a unique QR destination if capacity permits. Fund print separately from the media table.
SEO work should improve existing hub-to-offer connections before expanding the article library. Add contextual CTAs to preparation articles, buyer evaluation guides and appropriate project pages. Reconcile duplicate project URLs and stale index descriptions. Keep campaign-only pages noindex where appropriate; keep enduring, substantive public guides discoverable. Do not promise Google rankings or AI citations.
10. Execution over 90 days
Days 1–14: make one seller journey dependable. Choose the offer name and service boundaries; remove placeholders; create the sample written plan; establish the linked privacy policy and consent choices; test forms, delivery and mobile behavior; confirm calendar capacity; film three seller concepts and two buyer concepts. Review project freshness and public/private boundaries. Begin a controlled seller launch after these checks pass.
Days 15–30: establish the first operating baseline. Keep paid activity concentrated on sellers. Publish buyer comparisons and pre-construction material organically. Review every lead's actual request and outcome. Keep service response consistent. Compare website/native forms only when the first path is stable. Note reasons for poor fit—renovation-only request, wrong location, uncontactable, timing or mismatched offer. Publish the three weekly organic pieces. Use the first month's data to start assessing economics rather than importing internet CPL benchmarks; a small sample may require more time.
Days 31–60: improve the seller offer. Retain effective hooks, replace weak creative with a clearly different hypothesis, and tighten the landing page where people drop out. Publish one real approved case study if available. Improve contractor-introduction follow-through. If seller results and capacity justify diversification, reserve up to $200 of that month's $1,000 ceiling for one buyer-comparison test; otherwise keep the full available allocation focused on sellers. Do not add a simultaneous retargeting experiment.
Days 61–90: scale only with evidence. Shift spend toward attended qualified appointments and listing opportunities within the approved monthly ceiling. Expand a geographic area or add a power-of-sale paid test only if the main campaign produces suitable appointments and service capacity remains. Review signed clients and eventual completed transactions by original source; a pre-con registration or worksheet is not a completed sale.
Weekly scorecard and decision rules
Track separately for sellers, resale buyers, pre-con buyers and contractor-only inquiries:
Spend → valid inquiries → two-way conversations → qualified leads → booked appointments → attended appointments → signed clients → completed transactions
- Seller qualified: in the service area, has decision-making involvement, a stated selling timeframe or decision, and a relevant next step. Record representation conflicts appropriately.
- Buyer qualified: location/type and timing fit, a viable next step and enough privately discussed financial context to select suitable options. Do not score protected traits.
- Cost per attended qualified appointment: spend divided by attended qualified appointments.
- Conversation rate: two-way conversations divided by valid leads.
- Attendance rate: attended appointments divided by booked appointments.
- Listing-client rate: signed listing clients divided by attended seller appointments, measured by cohort.
Set the spending ceiling from your own economics: maximum acquisition cost per client × observed appointment-to-client rate = maximum sustainable appointment cost, using contribution after transaction costs and a risk buffer. Until there is credible history, treat this as a scenario, not a forecast. Do not publish a promised number of leads or sales for this budget.
Review weekly. Pause immediately for broken delivery, stale claims, incorrect routing or an unserviceable backlog. For performance decisions, agree a spend cap and minimum observation period before each test; low volume can make seven-day comparisons unreliable. Diagnose response failures before blaming creative. Increase budget only within the selected monthly cap and only when both lead quality and delivery capacity support it.
11. What to keep from the existing internal plans
The existing /know library already has a Home Value Concierge strategy, contractor-hub blueprint, reno-estimate campaign, Five Oaks social campaign, lead-conversion operating system and re-engagement scripts. Keep their strongest shared principles: practical construction insight, short tailored options, clear next actions, private contractor introductions and measuring appointments.
This plan consolidates them into one seller-led operating model. It replaces stale project calendars, unverified return examples, overly fragmented budgets and contradictory contact promises. The next work is execution and measurement of this model—not creating another disconnected hub or campaign manual.
Recommended first launch: one paid Prepare-to-Sell Review campaign in Oakville, Burlington and Milton, within a CAD $1,000 monthly ceiling. Support pre-construction, resale, contractor and power-of-sale services through organic content and permission-based relationships. Consider a small paid buyer test later only by reallocating the same budget. Judge success by useful conversations, attended reviews and signed clients.
Research sources and limitations
Website findings are based on direct live HTML retrieval on 10 October 2026. Relevant sources are linked at the point of use; the page inventory preserves the full route list. Site claims about price, tax, permits, project availability, credentials and results are observations of what the site says, not independent certifications.
Official external references consulted: Meta housing-ad fairness and audience restrictions, Meta Canadian delivery update, RECO online advertising, RECO permitted terms, and CRTC CASL requirements. Meta Help Centre login restrictions prevented verification of every current interface option; check the actual advertising account before implementation.